Which technical properties genuinely protect a photo backup — and which reassuring features (TLS, at-rest encryption, compliance badges) do not change who can read it.
Three private surfaces. Same zero-knowledge architecture.
Does not change it: - TLS / "encrypted in transit" — protects the network path, not the destination - "Encrypted at rest" with provider-managed keys — protects stolen hardware - Compliance audits — describe process quality, not key custody - "We never sell your data" — a commercial promise, not a technical barrier - Two-factor authentication — protects your login, not the provider's access
Does change it: - Key derivation on the device with a memory-hard KDF - Per-item keys sealed with an authenticated cipher - Encrypted file names and EXIF - Share links whose key material never reaches the server - No provider-side password reset that restores data
The answers that describe genuine private backup: on my device with Argon2id; no; both; no key material; ciphertext.
Durability: encrypted snapshots replicated to independent EU storage with immutability windows, plus automatic failover between providers if one becomes unavailable. The backups are ciphertext too — we cannot read our own copies of your library.
Three private surfaces. Same zero-knowledge architecture.